jonmsweeney

Archive for January, 2010|Monthly archive page

Today is Thomas Merton’s birthday

In Almost Catholic book, Monastic spirituality, Trappists on January 31, 2010 at 12:34 pm

Today is Thomas Merton’s birthday. He was born on this day in 1915. The following is a portion of a reflection from my recent book, Almost Catholic:

Mennonites turned me onto Thomas Merton while I was a teenager. I had questions that my own pastor could not answer when it came time for me to register as an 18-year old with Selective Service. “Why would it be right for me to kill another human being if Jesus told his disciples to ‘turn the other cheek’?” I had asked my pastor.

But I didn’t stop at Thomas Merton’s writings on war, justice, and peace. I went back to the beginning and read his youthful autobiography, The Seven Storey Mountain. Merton was brash and arrogant. He was fun and smart. His parents were painters and he spent more time in Manhattan and Europe than anywhere else in the U.S. Merton graduated from Columbia University and was a “big man on campus,” to be sure. But when he finally figured out who he really was, he had become a monk in a remote monastery in the hills of Kentucky.

In the summer of 1941, a few months before he became a monk, Merton was living in upstate New York teaching English at St. Bonaventure College. He was in his twenties and trying to figure out what to do with his life, attracted as he was to both the life of the mind (as a writer) and the life of the spirit (a possible, religious vocation). He was debating many things within himself: should he become a writer? Is it possible to be a writer without becoming full of oneself? What about the call to contemplation that he felt deep inside of himself?

These tensions made Merton’s life and work relevant to millions of readers, long after his death in 1968. Many of us bump up against these same questions—not necessarily because we are writers, as he was, but because we seek to exercise our talents without self-aggrandizement. To use the language of monastic spirituality, how do we dismantle our “false self,” and gradually discover our “true self,” as we succeed in our work in the world? This question filled Merton with anxiety throughout his life.

His autobiography was published when Merton was only thirty-three years old. He found it nearly impossible not to write about what was happening inside of him throughout his life as a cloistered monk. And that was odd. Why would a monk—a man who has taken many vows including a vow of silence—publish? During his first visit as a retreatant to The Abbey of Gethsemani in Kentucky, during Holy Week of 1941, he wrote in his journal, “I should tear out all the other pages of this book and all the other pages of everything else I ever wrote, and begin here.” In the years to follow, after hundreds of thousands of copies of The Seven Storey Mountain were purchased and read around the world, Merton would go through times when he wanted to stop writing altogether. He once wrote, “An author in a Trappist monastery is like a duck in a chicken coop. And he would give anything in the world to be a chicken instead of a duck.” But, still, he wrote, and expressed himself to millions of people beside his monastic brothers. These were times when he felt his ego growing faster than his spirit. But, thank God, they were short-lived, and he went back to his typewriter.

He was a Catholic in the broadest of all possible meanings of the word. The essence of Merton’s genius is also the reason why Merton’s writings will outlive those of most any other spiritual writer of the twentieth century. He taught those of us outside the monastery how to live more as if we were inside the monastery. He distilled the monastic life down to the point where it seemed possible to replicate it in the secular world. Before Merton, monasticism seemed to be a life of retreat, irrelevant scholarship, and prejudice against the world. After Merton, to live like a monk became synonymous with mindfulness, attentiveness, contemplation, and embracing of others.

Thomas Merton, pray for me.

Bede Griffith’s favorite quote from Indian scripture

In Catholic imagination, Christian mysticism, meaning of death/life, Monastic spirituality on January 28, 2010 at 6:24 pm

I know that Great Person

Of the brightness of the Sun

Beyond the darkness.

Only by knowing him

One goes beyond death.

There is no other way to go.

-Svetasvatura Upanishad

To know in the biblical sense

In Catholic imagination, Spiritual practice on January 28, 2010 at 3:59 pm

Isn’t it interesting that this phrase has the idiomatic meaning that it does, today? We joke sometimes about “knowing” someone in the biblical sense–and in those jokes we’re referring to the passages in the Bible where a man and woman are said, almost euphemistically to our ears, to “know” one another. By “knowing,” the text often means, sexually.

But that idiomatic, perhaps euphemistic, meaning, has a deeper meaning, too. To “know” in the biblical sense is not to just know something in our brains, intellectually, but to experience it, to engage deeply with it, to intensely come to understand it from the inside out.

Belief that’s Beautiful

In Almost Catholic book, Catholic imagination on January 26, 2010 at 3:16 pm

Go ahead and believe. It’s good for you.

Some beliefs–matters of faith–are completely without rational foundation but also, a part of my religious life. These sorts of beliefs, such as the parting of the Red Sea and the Virgin Birth, are part of the big story that encompasses my life. They are stories that tell my story. They are beautiful, and in their beauty, they are true.

Go ahead and believe such things. It doesn’t hurt anyone.

Obedience is not just tough to do

In Catholic imagination, Spiritual practice on January 25, 2010 at 3:15 am

It’s also really tough to discern, don’t you think?

The sermon at Mass this morning in Hanover, NH was given by a young Dominican deacon. He talked about the verbs “to hear” and “to obey” in three religious languages: Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. In all three languages, “hearing” and “obeying” come from the same root word. In other words, when a scripture says that we are to hear the word of the Lord (as in the Sh’ma of Judaism: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One”), that also means we are to obey that word.

Easier said than done, and not just because it is tough to do what we know we are supposed to do. Easier said than done, and not just because “hearing” isn’t simple. We also don’t all hear the same thing or things from the same words, whether those words are written down, given to us through the Liturgy, offered to us by a spiritual director, or offered to us in an even more private manner.

Obedience is not just tough to do. It’s tough to discern!

The Sunday routine of Cornel West

In Christian mysticism, evolving Protestants on January 24, 2010 at 8:03 pm

I love this—from today’s New York Times—a short interview with Cornel West about his “Sunday routine.” Asked if he is religious, he proudly says:

“I am, indeed, indeed. I am a profoundly Jesus-loving free black man who bears witness to truth and justice until the day I die.”

Me too. Spiritual, yes; but religious, you betcha.

About confession

In Catholic imagination, Spiritual practice on January 23, 2010 at 10:30 pm

When one confesses and says, O God, I have sinned, the very messenger sent to punish him for that sin has his power paralyzed and his hand stayed.

-Midrash Tanhuma

Why did G. Greene visit such depressing places?

In Catholic imagination, Graham Greene, meaning of death/life on January 20, 2010 at 12:28 am

Michelle Orange wrote a marvelous review of a collection of Greene letters in The Nation last May. In that review, she wrote:

“His early trips were aimless, though he was increasingly drawn to regions of conflict and suffering for narrative material as well as a kind of existential succor; Greene sought what his detractors have described as a morbid, almost decadent form of serenity, a sort he thought could be achieved only amid actual circumstantial horrors that matched or surpassed–and thereby stayed–those of an unquiet mind.”

I am not a Greene detractor in any way, shape, or form–but I agree with Orange’s characterization. Within a Catholic worldview, this sort of behavior makes some sense. Still morbid, but sense.

Greene Writing Later about Haiti

In Catholic imagination, Graham Greene on January 19, 2010 at 12:48 pm

Graham Greene writing about The Comedians

“The Comedians, I am glad to say, touched him [Papa Doc Duvalier] on the raw. He attacked it personally in an interview he gave in Le Matin, the paper he owned in Port-au-Prince — the only review I have ever received from a Chief of State. ‘Le livre n’est pas bien ecrit. Comme l’oeuvre d’un ecrivain et d’un journaliste, le livre n’a aucune valeur.’

“I am proud to have had Haitian friends who fought courageously in the mountains against Doctor Duvalier, but a writer is not so powerless as he usually feels, and a pen, as well as a silver bullet, can draw blood.”

from Ways of Escape, pp.230, 232

The Comedians

In Catholic imagination, Graham Greene on January 19, 2010 at 12:42 pm

Graham Greene’s novel, The Comedians, is one of his least known. It was written and published in the 1960s, during the same time period that he wrote and published his more famous novel, The Quiet American, on the Vietnam War. The Comedians is all about Doc Duvalier’s disastrous rule of Haiti.

It’s a prophetic book. Right at the outset, in a brief note to the publisher (and the reader), Greene concludes with this ominous sentence: “Only in Santo Domingo have things changed since I began this book–for the worse.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 909 other followers